论公司在股东代表诉讼中的法律地位摘要对股东代表诉讼的关注最早可以追溯到英国“福斯诉哈伯特”一案以及由该判例衍生出的“福斯规则”也即不允许少数股东向公司提起诉讼的基本规则，但该规则在公司独立人格受侵害时不适用；美国实行的业务判断原则通过罢免手段充分体现了对董事会的尊重，而股东代表诉讼并不是英美国家保护少数股东的主要手段。本文借鉴美国及日本股东代表诉讼制度的立法经验以及最高人民法院2016年12月12日原则通过的《公司法》司法解释(四)征求意见稿综合得出，我国股东代表诉讼的制度完善应当从完善原告诉讼费用缴纳制度、完善股东起诉保障制度、完善公司诉讼保障制度、简化诉讼前置程序制度以及完善举证责任分配制度等方面予以强化，最终以适应我国市场经济对于商事主体愈加宽松灵活的要求，切实保障公司的权益。关键词：股东代表诉讼；当事人适格；股东权益Onthelegalstatusofthecompanyinthelawsuitoftheshareholders'RepresentativeABSTRACTTheshareholderrepresentativelawsuitoriginatedfromtheBritishforthrule,whichforbidsminorityshareholderstobringalawsuitagainstthecompany.Whenthecompanyisfraudulentandcontrolled,itisnotapplicable.Itembodiesrespectfortheautonomyofthecompanyandtheindependentpersonalityofthecompany.ItisnotthemainmeanstoprotectminorityshareholdersinAngloAmericancountries.ThisarticledrawslessonsfromthelegislativeexperienceofthelitigationsystemoftheshareholdersrepresentativeoftheUnitedStatesandJapanandthedraftofthejudicialinterpretationofthecompanylaw(four)adoptedbytheSupremePeople'sCourtontheDecember12,2016principle.ItisconcludedthatthesystemofshareholderrepresentativelitigationinChinashouldbeperfectedbyperfectingthesystemofpayingtheplaintiff'slitigationexpensesandperfectingthesystemofshareholder'sprosecutionguarantee.Degree,improvethecompany'slitigationguaranteesystem,simplifythesystemofprepositionalprocedureandimprovethedistributionsystemoftheburdenofproof,andfinallytoadaptourmarketeconomytothebusinesssubjectmoreflexibleandflexiblerequirements,andeffectivelyprotecttherightsandinterestsofthecompany.Keywords:shareholderrepresentativeaction;litigant；shareholderbenefit目录ABSTRACT......................................................................................................................................4一、引言..........................................................................................................................................1二、相关理论概述...........................................................................................................................1（一）股东代表诉讼的概念...................................................................................................1（二）股东代表诉讼制度的功能...........................................................................................11.威慑功能.......................................................................................................................22.赔偿功能.......................................................................................................................23.促进董事义务的遵守...................................................................................................2（三）公司参加股东代表诉讼模式.......................................................................................21.域外公司参加股东代表诉讼的模式考察....................................................................22.我国公司参加股东代表诉讼的模式选择....................................................
VIP
