正方一辩陈述本方观点：从人类发展的终极目标看，我们要彻底地解决环境问题必须要标本兼治。要治本，必须优先发展经济，从根本上优化经济结构堵住产生环境问题的源头，要治标，同样要优先发展经济，为解决眼前的环境问题提供技术、资金等支持，只有这样，才能为人类生存和发展提供环境保障。Fromtheultimategoalofhumandevelopment,weneedtoaddressboththesymptomsandrootcausestosolvetheenvironmentalproblemsthoroughly.Toeffectapermanentcure,wemustgivefirstprioritytothedevelopmentofeconomy,andoptimizetheeconomicstructurefundamentallytoblockthesourceoftheenvironmentproblems；Totaketemporarysolution，wealsoshouldgiveprioritytothedevelopmentofeconomy,sothatwehavethetechnology,capitalandothersupportsforsolvingtheenvironmentalproblems.Onlyinthiswaycanenvironmentprotectionbeprovidedforhumansurvivalanddevelopment.反方一辩陈述本方观点：经济发展是指社会能够提供丰裕的商品来改善人类的物质生活,环境保护则是采取一定的政策措施来保护生态平衡。经济要发展意味着企业需要更多的厂房与原材料来保障商品的供应——那便存在一个问题：自然分给人类的土地与原材料是有限,经济优先发展就一定会侵占原本不属于人类的自然资源。Theeconomicdevelopmentreferstosocietycanprovideabundantcommoditytoimprovehumanmateriallife;environmentalprotectionistotakecertainpolicymeasurestoprotecttheecologicalbalance.economicdevelopmentmeansthatcompaniesneedmoreworkshopandrawmaterialstoensurethesupplyofgoods——thenthereisaproblem,thatisnaturelandandrawmaterialstohumanislimited,economicprioritydevelopmentwilloccupynatureresourceswhichoriginallydonotbelongtothehuman.二辩盘问Twodebatequestioned反方二辩：请问对方一辩，经济是一时之事，环境是万代之事，哪个重要？经济发展慢了，人们还可以吃到饭，环境没了，还能生存吗？Myfellowdebaters，pleaseallowmetoask.Theeconomyisthetemporarymatter,buttheenvironmentisofthetenthousandgeneration,whichoneismoreimportant?WhenEconomicdevelopsslowly,peoplecanalsoeatrice;howcanwestillsurviveifthereisnoenvironment.正方一辩：不好意思对方辩友，恐怕我们今天讨论的重点是优先权。并不是说经济优先就不搞环保了，只是环保处于较次的位置，跟中国现状一样，政策虽然说要重视环保，但一般县区还是经济发展优先的，也就有资本的大城市才比较重视搞环保，相信大家心知肚明Sorry,I'mafraidthekeypointswedebatetodayaretherightofpriority.Economydevelopmentfirstdoesnotmeantotallyignoretheenvironmentalprotection,theenvironmentalprotectionisjustintheinferiorposition.JustlikethepresentChina,althoughthepolicyattachgreatimportancetoenvironmentalprotection,economicdevelopmentreceivepriorityinthegeneralcounties,thereisonlycapitalcitieswouldlikelytakeitseriouslytoenvironmentalprotection,everybodyknowitinourownheart.反方二辩：请问正方三辩，如果发展经济优先的话，很可能造成环境成本大于经济效益的情况，这样的经济是发展还是倒退？Excuseme,myfellowdebaters.Ifeconomicdevelopmentreceivesprioritythenitislikelytocausetheenvironmentalcoststobelargerthantheeconomicefficiency,sucheconomydevelopsorbacksup?正方三辩：这种情况确实有存在，但并不是每时每刻都存在。各个行业情况不同，我们不能以偏概全。但按你的意思，这种情况下经济效益是负的，那我们改行环境保护优先，就能转亏为盈？我不这么觉得。Thiskindofsituationistheretruly,butnoteverymoment.Thesituationineachindustryisdifferent;wecannotdrawconclusionsfromonepart.Butaccordingtoyourpoint,inthiscasetheeconomicbenefitisnegative,thenifwechangedenvironmentfirst,wecanturnitintoprofit?Idon'tthinkso.正方四辩补充发言：asadevelopingcountry,theeconomypowerisfarbehindt...
