电脑桌面
添加小米粒文库到电脑桌面
安装后可以在桌面快捷访问

复议机关作共同被告案件的举证责任研究

复议机关作共同被告案件的举证责任研究_第1页
复议机关作共同被告案件的举证责任研究_第2页
复议机关作共同被告案件的举证责任研究_第3页
复议机关作共同被告案件的举证责任研究【摘要】新修订的行政诉讼法创新规定经行政复议且作维持决定的情形,复议机关也要作被告。本文试图立足于现行法律规定,运用规范分析法、案例分析法、比较分析法等研究方法,探讨原行政行为举证责任、维持决定举证责任、两行为合法性证明的关系等问题,分析谁来实施举证行为、证明对象及其关系、原行政机关和复议机关的举证责任如何分配。尝试使现行的举证责任规定更为精细化,以尽量减少在案件审理和纠纷解决中适用难题的产生几率。同时结合《行政复议法》部分法律条文讨论新制度设计带来的冲突如何协调,以及现行举证责任设计对复议机构功能定位的影响。【关键词】复议机关 共同被告 举证责任 1Research on the Burden of Proof of the Administrative Reconsideration Organ As a Co Defendant[Abstract]The new administrative procedure law creatively stipulated the system that the reconsideration organ shall be the joint defendant if it makes maintenance decision after the administrative review. The thesis which is based on the current laws has tried to discuss the problems such as the proof of the legality of the original administrative act, the proof of the legality of reconsideration decision and the relationship between the legality of the original administrative act and the legality of reconsideration decision so that analyzed who to perform the burden of proof, the objects of proof and their relationships, as well as how to distribute the burden of proof between the original administrative body and the reconsideration organ by applying research methods such as normative analysis. The thesis tries to make the current stipulation on the burden of proof more detailed and workable so that the incidence of applicable problems of laws can be reduced in the case trial and dispute resolution. At the same time, the thesis has also discussed the impact of the current stipulation on the burden of...

1、当您付费下载文档后,您只拥有了使用权限,并不意味着购买了版权,文档只能用于自身使用,不得用于其他商业用途(如 [转卖]进行直接盈利或[编辑后售卖]进行间接盈利)。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。
3、如文档内容存在违规,或者侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权等,请点击“违规举报”。

碎片内容

文章天下+ 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

各种文档应有尽有

确认删除?
VIP
微信客服
  • 扫码咨询
会员Q群
  • 会员专属群点击这里加入QQ群
客服邮箱
回到顶部