中文摘要民事执行和解制度这几年在实践中得到广泛的应用，不仅维护了司法权威，也保障了社会的和谐稳定。但民事执行和解制度作为我国民事法律中的特色制度，之前在许多方面都存在不足。就立法层面，我国民事诉讼法律未对民事执行和解协议的效力、性质、审查等方面做出明确规定；就实践层面，出现执行和解演变成执行调解、执行和解协议履行不力等情况。这些问题的存在导致我国民事执行和解在实践时出现了很多困难。但是，随着《关于执行和解若干问题的规定》（以下简称为《执行和解规定》）在 2018 年被颁布实施，执行和解协议的地位得到了肯定、对执行和解与执行外和解两组概念进行了区分、对执行担保直接强制执行的条件、在履行过程中的提存问题等都做出了说明。可即便如此，现行立法仍不能将理论上和实践中出现的问题全都概括，有些问题依然需要不断地摸索，在不久的将来进行明确。关键词：民事执行和解；协议；性质；效力AbstractThe civil execution reconciliation system has been widely used in practice in recent years, which not only maintains the judicial authority, but also guarantees the social harmony and stability. However, as a characteristic system of civil law in China, the civil execution reconciliation system has been deficient in many aspects. On the legislative level, China's civil litigation law does not make clear provisions on the effectiveness, nature, review and other aspects of the civil execution settlement agreement; On the practical level, the implementation of reconciliation has evolved into the implementation of mediation, the implementation of the settlement agreement is weak and so on. The existence of these problems leads to many difficulties in the practice of civil execution reconciliation in China. But as the regulation of some issues concerning the execution reconciliation "(hereinafter referred to as" the execution reconciliation rules ") was enacted in 2018, and take the affirmation and the status of the settlement agreement to perform reco...
